Monday, February 26, 2024

Celebrations not entirely justified as EU turns 30

Avatar photo
Not all of the bloc’s economic innovations have worked out, writes Allan Barber.
European Union agricultural emissions did not significantly alter for over a decade, an EU report said. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Under the leadership of European Commissioner Jacques Delors, 1993 was the year the European Union was established. With a much grander vision than the EEC that preceded it, the EU had the goal of political union across the whole of Europe with the right to travel, work and live freely across member countries, moving towards a single currency, which was launched on January 1 1999 with the formal introduction of banknotes and cash three years later. Only the United Kingdom rejected the euro, a decision for which it is now profoundly grateful.

It is coincidental that the 30th anniversary occurred in 2023, the same year Delors died at the age of 98. Economic commentators have recently asked the big question whether the EU’s formation, the major achievement of its instigator, can be regarded as a success. British analysts, as one would expect, have tended to indulge in a dose of schadenfreude at what they see as an ambitious project that has actually gone backwards over its 30-year existence, more notably over the 25 years since the euro’s introduction.  European Central Bank (ECB) president Christine Lagarde was reduced to singing the praises of the beauty of the new banknotes that are about to be issued, reflecting satisfaction that many European citizens may not even be able to remember a time when the franc, deutschmark, lira and others were the individual currencies.

She made the valid point that the single currency unites Europe by making it easier to work, conduct business and ensure price stability, although she failed to mention the salient point that the EU’s share of global GDP has roughly halved since the euro’s introduction. 

Price stability hasn’t been a great success either, with inflation differing wildly from one country to another, whereas greater stability may have been achieved if each country’s currency had been allowed to float independently according to its own economic performance and inflation rate. 

The ECB’s original intention was not to bail out individual members’ economies by underwriting huge amounts of debt, which effectively allows them to avoid the tough decisions. However, if it hadn’t resorted to debt funding during the global financial crisis, the whole project would probably have blown apart.

Fifteen years ago Greece hit a financial crisis that necessitated 12 rounds of tax cuts, spending cuts and reforms, resulting in civil riots as well as bailouts from the International Monetary Fund and ECB, in the face of strong objections, particularly from Germany. 

Greece also negotiated a 50% reduction of private bank debt to the tune of €100 billion. The Greek recession at that time was the longest ever suffered by a developed economy. On the other side of the Adriatic, Italy’s economy has remained virtually stagnant for the past 20 years. 

There is little evidence political and currency union, administered by a massive bureaucracy in Brussels, has actually delivered the economic growth envisaged by Delors in the early 1990s. 

By 2004 he had become disillusioned with the single currency concept because member governments had failed to commit to a common fiscal policy, without which it could not work efficiently. He even agreed the UK had done the right thing by rejecting the euro, although he supported its continued membership of the EU at the time of the Brexit referendum.

The original goal of the EU was to reduce barriers to trade and encourage competition, which explains why the British prime minister at the time, Margaret Thatcher, supported it enthusiastically. But these goals were hindered or defeated by the imposition of centralised product regulation and workplace legislation, the introduction of the single currency without consideration of the wide discrepancies in economic performance across the bloc, and the omission of services which make up more than three-quarters of economic activity.

Delors’ vision was to build a European model of society that would present a strong counterpoint to the “savage capitalism” of a United States-dominated global economy. This social model envisaged imposing workplace legislation centrally on all member states, covering working conditions, hours of work and wages, which naturally enough strangled competitiveness and innovation. 

To place this in a New Zealand context, one only needs to reflect on the dramatic increase in the number of public servants since 2017, the introduction of fair pay agreements, and the regular increase in the minimum wage without consideration of the impact on inflation or productivity. 

The EU currently shows many of the same characteristics as this country – higher than desirable inflation, declining productivity, a bloated bureaucracy – but at least we have the advantages of being able (mostly) to make our own decisions, change governments every three years if we want, and having only one currency to worry about.

A biographer of Delors described the EU as “the house that Jacques built”, but it is possible by the time of his death in December that he may have seriously questioned whether his design was good enough to ensure its long-term survival.

People are also reading